|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lightning35 Delta514
48TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCE
156
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 03:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
Personally, they have no purpose other than a quick way to reach an objective or to run people over. LAVs are Light Assault Vehicles. I don't like the fact that it's not really "effective" at that. What do I mean? Well, to begin with, if the vehicle is not moving, it is likely to be taken out by an HAV, a dropsuit placing REs on it, or being swarmed/forged. The only way to actually kill people is for the vehicle to be still, giving the gunner a good chance to land all te bullets on a target. The only other way I see someone killing someone while moving is with missles, but even still it's somewhat hard.
I propose a small to medium increase in LAV hp to soak up more damage while actually "assaulting" enemies. 2 forge shots are enough to wipe out a lav. 3 swarms, 3 plasma cannon.
Next, I read that the fragmented small missles will be reintroduced. That will help the missles, but the other 2 turrets need work. Now, I will mention that I liked back then when the rail guns were av, blaster was ai, and missles were hybrid. I'd like to say that I really wish that could return as this game is not the same anymore when it comes to vehicles. With that, I'd like small turrets to function the same, obviously at a redused level.
I propose the small rail guns to have an increase to damage, near 500 +/- and redused RoF. That would help it be effective at av and crappy at ai. Range increase will help as well
Small blasters need increased damage, same range, and redused heat build up. A smal reduction to desperation will help in ai while keeping it weak at av.
Missles should be hybrid, mid range, strong direct damage for av, while having mid-high splash damage for ai.
This will improve Lav experience and effectiveness on the battle field.
2 LAVs could circle a HAV and destroy it with small rail turrets. A lav could wipe out heavies guarding an objective without being wiped out quickly. A lav with small missles would be perfect at taking out enemy LAVs, helping out to wipe out a tank, or support a friendly blaster lav while suppressing enemies.
As so, large turrets should be affected in the same way to provide a better HAV experience.
48th Special Operations Force.
"As a team or alone, I dominate the battlefield."
|
Lightning35 Delta514
48TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCE
158
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 03:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
As for large turrets, make them as they were before again. A blaster should be ai, rail av, and missles both.
Increase damage/ reduse RoF on rail Increase damage/ reduse dispiration on blaster Reduse damage/ increase splash for missles
48th Special Operations Force.
"As a team or alone, I dominate the battlefield."
|
Lightning35 Delta514
48TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCE
160
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 18:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
Derpty Derp wrote:I disagree, because LAV's can be used quite effectively if you plan ahead.
You don't have to stop (unless you're switching to the gunners seat or on rough terrain) just slowing down to a steady crawl will leave the turret accurate enough to take a kill.
Even when stopping, the thing moves so damn fast you can escape just about anything (other than a crap ton of av ambushing you when you get them really angry.)
Small blasters are absolutely bad ass, you can setup a gunner suit (sentinel with a very cheap weapon and lots of hp) park up next to a HMG and have time to watch the tear roll down his cheek as he realises he's not invincible.
Small rails have so much range, you shouldn't be shot by anything other than a forge or sniper when using one.
Missiles... Well they're for dropships, because your gunner is aiming down with it, they will likely blow up your own jeep.
LAV's are used to blow up other LAV's all the time. Against dropships you can use the missiles to knock them off balance so they struggling to hit you, while you move between reloads. Taking on tanks is suicide, unless the tanker is stupid... Like really stupid, or you scare them into thinking you've got explosives on the front and they run away.
I wouldn't type this if they were like that at least most of the time.
48th Special Operations Force.
"As a team or alone, I dominate the battlefield."
|
Lightning35 Delta514
48TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCE
160
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 23:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:Well, an increase to HP...yes, but probably not in the way you're thinking.
Nerf the base HP in the ground, give it more slots, and make the modules worth fitting so the overall HP of a *fitted* LAV is higher, but cheap unfitted LAVs are significantly weaker. Like HAVs, LAVs have too much HP on the hull and not enough in the slots.
Good idea. Keep the current hp or reduse it slightly, and add more modules. That would be like a heavy to a scout. Heavies have high hp and few slots, scouts have low go and lots of slots. That would be a lav(scout) to hav(heavy). Then just fox the turrets.
Blaster would be your hmg/assault rifles for scout/lav and HAV/heavy- ai
Rail would be your forge/plasma- av
Missle would be your mass driver (after the breach is made to av) or remote explosives- hybrid.
48th Special Operations Force.
"As a team or alone, I dominate the battlefield."
|
Lightning35 Delta514
48TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCE
160
|
Posted - 2015.01.28 02:16:00 -
[5] - Quote
I also agree that LAVs should follow the same way as the adv and proto HAVs, having more pg/cpu per level. Reduse the hp of them, add more slots to set the standard, then adjust them per level Ex:
Gal lav- current:1high/2low, new: 2 high, 4 low Cal lav- current:2high/1low, new: 4 high, 2 low
48th Special Operations Force.
"As a team or alone, I dominate the battlefield."
|
Lightning35 Delta514
48TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCE
160
|
Posted - 2015.01.28 11:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
^
48th Special Operations Force.
"As a team or alone, I dominate the battlefield."
|
Lightning35 Delta514
48TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCE
161
|
Posted - 2015.01.28 16:01:00 -
[7] - Quote
Sinboto Simmons wrote:Any thoughts for the LLV and an improved SLAV
I'd say don't make them, just add new modules to use. Now you can choose (For LAVs) to fill you slots with logi stuff(rep turret and bla bla bla) or tank it and go av or ai (rail/blaster) or both missles.
48th Special Operations Force.
"As a team or alone, I dominate the battlefield."
|
Lightning35 Delta514
48TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCE
161
|
Posted - 2015.01.28 19:10:00 -
[8] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:Lightning35 Delta514 wrote:I also agree that LAVs should follow the same way as the adv and proto HAVs, having more pg/cpu per level. Reduse the hp of them, add more slots to set the standard, then adjust them per level Ex:
Gal lav- current:1high/2low, new: 2 high, 4 low Cal lav- current:2high/1low, new: 4 high, 2 low
4/2 huh....hmmmmmmmmm part of me says that's too many slots, but I could see it working. Nomal LAVs Amarr 2/4 Caldari 4/2 Gallente 2/4 Minmatar 3/3 Specialist LAVs Amarr 1/3 Caldari 3/1 Gallente 1/3 Minmatar 2/2 maybe?
It's alot of slots but with redused lav hp. So either you tank and go assault or go logi and add other stuff
48th Special Operations Force.
"As a team or alone, I dominate the battlefield."
|
Lightning35 Delta514
48TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCE
161
|
Posted - 2015.01.28 19:13:00 -
[9] - Quote
At least that would be eaiser with the only difference between other LAVs would be pg/cpu
48th Special Operations Force.
"As a team or alone, I dominate the battlefield."
|
Lightning35 Delta514
48TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCE
163
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 00:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
Any module ideas?
48th Special Operations Force.
"As a team or alone, I dominate the battlefield."
|
|
Lightning35 Delta514
48TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCE
163
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 12:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
So, anytime they will be looked at? I'd like to see them differently in warlords 1,0.
48th Special Operations Force.
"As a team or alone, I dominate the battlefield."
|
|
|
|